Gavin Baker and David Sacks explained their support for the White House safety accord in their own X posts on October 1. Baker, whose profile identifies him as Atreides Management's chief investment officer, emphasizes outside auditors reporting to an independent board committee.
Baker expects consequences for directors who disregard safety warnings. He points to possible court findings and implications for directors-and-officers insurance. That is his legal assessment, not an established outcome in a specific case.
Sacks explicitly responds to Baker and also invokes existing FTC and securities law. His new rationale goes beyond the endorsement already documented on September 29; it is neither an uncommented repost nor an additional company pledge.
This risk signal records their shared argument from both original posts. It does not establish that promised audits have occurred, reduced risk or triggered particular legal consequences. The voluntary accord is not presented as a new law.